WebSupreme Court of India Indra Sawhney & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 8 August, 1991 Bench: Rangnath Misra (Cj), K.N. Singh, M.H. Kania, Kuldip Singh, P.B. Sawant CASE NO.: PETITIONER: INDRA SAWHNEY & ORS. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/1991 BENCH: RANGNATH MISRA (CJ) & K.N. SINGH & … WebHe emphasized that Indra Sawhney had indicated that reservations cannot be granted solely based on economic concerns. ... Indira Sawhney Vs. Union of India AIR 1993, SC 477. [10] Ojaswini Gupta, Janhit Abhiyan vs. Union of India, 2024: Case comment, LawBhoomi (Jan 25, 2024, 8:15 AM), ...
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India AIR 1993 SC 477
WebFebruary 14, 2024 Case Brief on Indra Sawhney v. Union of India AIR 1993 SC 477 PRIMARY DETAILS OF THE CASE: Introduction: One of the most important cases that … WebCase Summary – Lily Thomas v Union of India (2013) Background This case pertains to the disqualification of Members of Parliament or the Legislature as the case may be and was pronounced by a two-judge bench comprised of Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.J. Mukhopadhaya in the year 2013. how to edge for men
Indra Sawhney Vs Union Of India, 1992. - YouTube
Web27 mei 2024 · Title of the Case: Indra Sawhney Etc. vs Union of India and Others 1992 Citation: AIR 1993 SC 477, 1992 Supp 2 SCR 454 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: M Kania, M Venkatachaliah, S R Pandian, . T Ahmadi, K Singh, P Sawant, R Sahai, B J Reddy Parties Involved: Appellant: Indra Sawhney Etc Respondent: Union of India and … The Indra Sawhney case was decided by a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in 1992 by considering the ‘Mandal Commission Report’ and the controversy that followed it. The case is famous for laying down several landmark propositions such as 50% threshold in the reservation, also the exclusion of … Meer weergeven In the celebrated case of Indra Sawhney, the court had discussed the reservation policy, the threshold limit of 50%, criteria to analyze … Meer weergeven In the year 1953, the President appointed the First Backward Classes Commission popularly known as the ‘Kaka Kalelkar Commission’ under Article 340(1) of the Constitution … Meer weergeven Article 14 of the Indian constitution- Equality before law and equal protection[v] Article 15(4) of the Indian Constitution- Special provision for the advancement of socially and … Meer weergeven WebThe 50% ceiling limit does not apply to Article 15(6). The law decided in Indra Sawhney v Union of India does not apply to the present case, as it related to social and educational backwardness under Articles 16(1) and 16(4). However, Articles 15(6) and 16(6) relate to economic backwardness and should be tested independently. how to edge flower beds correctly